Yes, but that's not the whole story. For instance, Trump offered to cooperate with the FBI in the 1980s (https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-flipping-history-cooperating-fbi-2018-8?op=1). That means that US intelligence was also working him. And the result was the collapse of the USSR in 1991. We'll probably never know the whose story.
Your comment raises an intriguing, though speculative, dimension to the Trump-Soviet story. It’s true that Trump interacted with both the FBI and Soviet figures in the 1980s, but the implication that he was simultaneously cultivated by U.S. intelligence and instrumental in the USSR’s collapse lacks documented support.
The narrative in Information-Warfare Magazine focuses on psychological and ideological influence rather than formal espionage. It illustrates how state actors may leverage ego, ambition, and spectacle, not always through direct control, but through cultivation.
OMG. So you’re saying I can stay at the Trump Hotel in Moscow?? Did not know that. But this proves he is a Russian asset and plans to destroy Democracy with the help of his BFF Putin and we’re all screwed.
Krushchev was the Russian who predicted Russia would take down USA from the inside. He reached out to Trump in 1987 and now in 2025, Trump is taking down the USA.
The thing about the far left, like Bernie and Aoc is that they are losers nationally. But they want to be the face of the party. They want the real party leaders to step aside and bring forth their agenda. They don’t seem to understand, it not where America is. Abraham Lincoln said you can’t do anything without the sentiment of the people. They don’t understand this. They want to push their agenda on everyone without working to bring it about. That’s where Hillary Clinton was a genius. She worked on incremental change. That is lasting change. You pass laws that become the norm and are excepted thought time. In time they are thought of as the norm. And then they are excepted. The so called progressive are really regressive. Because they don’t do the work to implement change. They think everyone should just except it because they do. It might work in small provincial areas like small Reas of Brooklyn, or Vermont where they live. They want to push that on America without doing the work to make it the norm. So they lose nationally like Bernie and AOC always do. AOC only needs 18,000 votes to win district. That is not America. Bernie only needs to convince Vermonters. That is not America. What they’re pushing is revolution.
For instance, Abraham Lincoln was not against slavery when he ran for president because he knew he didn’t have the public sentiment with him. He wouldn’t have won if he tried to push it. He waited till he had the public sentiment on his side. He did the work. He played politics. Bernie and AOC are not playing politics. They are pushing their agenda, and that’s why they lose. They haven’t done the work that’s needed. They both spurned Hillary because, she was someone who learned how to pass laws. It’s tedious. Hard work. Takes time and patience. What Bernie and AOC push is revolution. Which is chaos, and does not advance society in a lasting manner. When you have a sophisticated society, you have to work with it, and it’s hard work. It takes time. But it brings about lasting change. They kick Hillary to the curb because they wanted immediate gratification. So they need young people who are impetuous, naïve and uneducated.
Yes, but that's not the whole story. For instance, Trump offered to cooperate with the FBI in the 1980s (https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-flipping-history-cooperating-fbi-2018-8?op=1). That means that US intelligence was also working him. And the result was the collapse of the USSR in 1991. We'll probably never know the whose story.
Your comment raises an intriguing, though speculative, dimension to the Trump-Soviet story. It’s true that Trump interacted with both the FBI and Soviet figures in the 1980s, but the implication that he was simultaneously cultivated by U.S. intelligence and instrumental in the USSR’s collapse lacks documented support.
The narrative in Information-Warfare Magazine focuses on psychological and ideological influence rather than formal espionage. It illustrates how state actors may leverage ego, ambition, and spectacle, not always through direct control, but through cultivation.
he was invited cause his grandfather was a nazi
Trump was groomed. He was a useful idiot for the Russians to use against the US.
Hase Fiero: Thanks for the Trump-Moscow film. Well done, I think.
I wish there was more action on this video. THIS should be OUT THERE!!!
OMG. So you’re saying I can stay at the Trump Hotel in Moscow?? Did not know that. But this proves he is a Russian asset and plans to destroy Democracy with the help of his BFF Putin and we’re all screwed.
Krushchev was the Russian who predicted Russia would take down USA from the inside. He reached out to Trump in 1987 and now in 2025, Trump is taking down the USA.
Pride, is the biggest problem with Trump.
He stayed at Putin’s castle for 3-4 months. Supposedly he wanted to be the ambassador. That was a lie too obviously.
Trump is a useful idiot to ANYONE that compliments him and gives him money. He has no morals, no ethics, no empathy. Trump is vested in Trump.
Yes
Remember Trump was totally broke at this time!
The thing about the far left, like Bernie and Aoc is that they are losers nationally. But they want to be the face of the party. They want the real party leaders to step aside and bring forth their agenda. They don’t seem to understand, it not where America is. Abraham Lincoln said you can’t do anything without the sentiment of the people. They don’t understand this. They want to push their agenda on everyone without working to bring it about. That’s where Hillary Clinton was a genius. She worked on incremental change. That is lasting change. You pass laws that become the norm and are excepted thought time. In time they are thought of as the norm. And then they are excepted. The so called progressive are really regressive. Because they don’t do the work to implement change. They think everyone should just except it because they do. It might work in small provincial areas like small Reas of Brooklyn, or Vermont where they live. They want to push that on America without doing the work to make it the norm. So they lose nationally like Bernie and AOC always do. AOC only needs 18,000 votes to win district. That is not America. Bernie only needs to convince Vermonters. That is not America. What they’re pushing is revolution.
For instance, Abraham Lincoln was not against slavery when he ran for president because he knew he didn’t have the public sentiment with him. He wouldn’t have won if he tried to push it. He waited till he had the public sentiment on his side. He did the work. He played politics. Bernie and AOC are not playing politics. They are pushing their agenda, and that’s why they lose. They haven’t done the work that’s needed. They both spurned Hillary because, she was someone who learned how to pass laws. It’s tedious. Hard work. Takes time and patience. What Bernie and AOC push is revolution. Which is chaos, and does not advance society in a lasting manner. When you have a sophisticated society, you have to work with it, and it’s hard work. It takes time. But it brings about lasting change. They kick Hillary to the curb because they wanted immediate gratification. So they need young people who are impetuous, naïve and uneducated.
the long con by Russia
Russian banks bailed him out, eh?
Thanks for the info !